In the perfect world that had perfect students who all came to school every day with the desire to learn for the sake of learning, who worked hard not to compete with others or to make good grades to get into colleges, but instead to further their intellectual capacity, where the teachers could always be 10 steps ahead of the students with perfect lesson plans for the students who were all on the same ability level...then using inductive strategies would be the only way to teach. At HCHS, however, this of course isn't the case. Don't get me wrong, there are definitely students who really do love doing mathematical problems and enjoy thinking about the world in a mathematical way...but this is certainly not the majority. Too many of the students are too far behind to be able to inductively reason laws or rules or methods...it's discouraging and sad and I don't always teach the way I want to teach, but I do the best I can.
In my classroom, I have to admit I mostly lecture, however I do constantly ask questions. I have learned to use the overhead (finally!) and I do it in such a way that I don't give it all away at once. Nothing makes me more more bored than for students to simply copy notes and not say a word...I ask them questions and get them to think and attempt to answer before revealing the correct rule, method, or law. And oftentimes, they get it, or at least partially get it. And I work with whatever they give me. I can tell they enjoy class more when they get to think for themselves and use their own prior knowledge (although much of what I teach they should have already been taught...it makes me wonder about how truly effective "I Can" labs are for Algebra I). It makes them have a little more ownership of the class, gives them a little more confidence and motivation to go farther...
A classroom where the teacher simply has notes, talks, and students copy, or even worse one where students are just given worksheets to complete with no classroom interaction, is not effective, relaxed, or pleasant (although I admit it is work-oriented, one of the 3 main goals of an effective classroom, but who would want to work if it's boring and unpleasant?). Inductive reasoning is a beautiful thing, and I would like to try to incorporate it more in my classroom. However, because I am a first year teacher and am still in many ways just-making-it, I often stick to what's easiest and seems to (usually) be pretty effective with my students--deductive teaching with constant discussion.
Wednesday, September 28, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
"Putting crowd wisdom to work" and the creeps
But then I guess they wouldn't publicize that, would they. -- Sorry, it's the conspiracy theorist in me.
Nice to see some decent content for a change. FYI, I log on today and see that we've got a new feature, the 'Flag blog' button, which is inconveniently located between the 'Get Your Own Blog' and 'Next Blog' buttons so that we would presumably be getting some flags on error alone (although if one happens to notice it, you can unflag a blog) But that's a trivial matter. What concerns me is this: When a person visiting a blog clicks the "Flag?" button in the Blogger Navbar, it means they believe the content of the blog may be potentially offensive or illegal. We track the number of times a blog has been flagged as objectionable and use this information to determine what action is needed. This feature allows the blogging community as a whole to identify content they deem objectionable. Ok, see the problem with this? What's "objectionable." I'm guessing there are a good deal of people that would likely deem my blog to be objectionable; and there lies the problem: what is objectionable and what is subjective. Just my 2 cents, Nokia Mobile Phones
Post a Comment